<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wonky Gibbon Ramblings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk</link>
	<description>Copyright 2009 by djg. All Rights Reserved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 12:54:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung LED TV with HDMI stretches Windows Desktop</title>
		<link>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/315/hardware/samsung-led-tv-with-hdmi-stretches-windows-desktop.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/315/hardware/samsung-led-tv-with-hdmi-stretches-windows-desktop.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following on from my last post &#8211; I replaced the VGA and stereo audio cables with a single HDMI cable from the Graphics Card to the Samsung LED TV. I had to reboot the Media Center for it to allow me to reassign the default audio output to the HDMI output but once I had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following on from my last post &#8211; I replaced the VGA and stereo audio cables with a single HDMI cable from the Graphics Card to the Samsung LED TV.</p>
<p>I had to reboot the Media Center for it to allow me to reassign the default audio output to the HDMI output but once I had restarted it let me do so. It looks like it detects whether the audio is connected as the machine boots rather than as a &#8220;hot&#8221; plug n play sort of thing.</p>
<p>Now for the nasty bit &#8230; the Windows desktop was now stretched beyond the sides of the screen. A good long search through the graphics driver controls yielded nothing to change the size and position.</p>
<p>Fiddling with the Samsung TV I then did find a setting that helped. Under Menu-&gt;Screen Adjustment there&#8217;s a setting called &#8220;Screen Fit&#8221; &#8211; the result of using this was that the desktop properly fitted on the screen. Problem was &#8211; it still looked wrong compared to the crisp output I&#8217;d had using the VGA cable. As though the screen had been stretched, introducing artifacts and then squashed again &#8211; leaving them behind.</p>
<p>Googling was required to solve the problem and I&#8217;m glad I did as I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d have ever found the answer &#8211; and I&#8217;m endebted to this post for the answer:<br />
<a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1666329">http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1666329</a><br />
The very first post nails the problem (ignore the rest of the thread). It says &#8220;Go into the menu on the TV and select Source List, Edit Name, then chose the HDMI and change the name to be either PC, DVI or DVI-PC. Either of these three setting should correct the over sized display issue.&#8221; &#8211; and the author is right. Giving a &#8220;Name&#8221; to the HDMI connection, corrects the problem. In fact the word name is really misleading, it&#8217;s really a &#8220;Type&#8221; &#8211; particularly as you pick the one you want from a list rather than choosing your own from scratch.</p>
<p>Making this setting, resolves the problem and removes the artifacts. Very confusing bit of UI from Samsung.</p>
<p>End result &#8211; great looking display and a reduction in the number of cables. So musn&#8217;t grumble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/315/hardware/samsung-led-tv-with-hdmi-stretches-windows-desktop.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upgrading Media Center to HD</title>
		<link>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/311/hardware/upgrading-media-center-to-hd.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/311/hardware/upgrading-media-center-to-hd.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PVR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve slowly been adding the ability to handle HD content to my media center of late. As usual, the machine is well underpowered so it always stretches the components. I started by adding a Black Gold BGT3620 Dual HD tuner. This supports both Freeview and Freeview HD (as well as analogue and cable). Setup as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve slowly been adding the ability to handle HD content to my media center of late. As usual, the machine is well underpowered so it always stretches the components.</p>
<p>I started by adding a Black Gold BGT3620 Dual HD tuner. This supports both Freeview and Freeview HD (as well as analogue and cable). Setup as always was very easy and it works with Windows 7 Media Center seamlessly. This is an expensive high end card. As mentioned in other posts, the key difference between this and other tuner cards is that Black Gold do a lot more of the stream processing on card rather than relying on the CPU to do the processing. This allows the rest of the machine to be a rather lower spec and prevents the CPU becoming a bottlekneck.</p>
<p>I then added a Samsung UE40D5000 40&#8243; LED TV (which is excellent incidentally &#8211; the blacks are &#8230; err &#8230; very black!). This has a Freeview tuner built in (but not Freeview HD). I also didn&#8217;t go for any of the built in internet / iplayer gizmo&#8217;s that some of the more expensive Samsungs go for &#8211; on the grounds that since it&#8217;s attached to a PC &#8211; the PC is doing all of that.</p>
<p>Once the TV was connected up and the output from the graphics card altered to the new resolution it became clear that the move up from 720&#215;576 to 1900&#215;1080 was clearly a step to far and at this resolution the media center really started to struggle. SD content was ok, but any rapid movement in the HD content it could not cope with becoming stuttery and blocky. The Graphics Card, a GeForce 6200LE for PCI-E clearly couldn&#8217;t cope. Given this was launched in 2004 perhaps this isn&#8217;t surprising but it&#8217;s worth mentioning because until 2011 it was still being sold as a budget card around the £25 mark. It had a fill rate of approx 700 megapixels / second.</p>
<p>Taking the card out and relying on the onboard graphics capabilities of the motherboard, a Gigabyte GA-946GMX-S2 i946GZ actually improved performance which was unexpected. But then a new budget card was dropped in, the GeForce G210 (£27 inc Vat), launched in 2008. With a fill rate of 4.1 gigapixels / second, clearly much quicker. The result? HD playback is now flawless. As always I buy fanless cards for the media center &#8211; I want to listen to the movie, not the machine.</p>
<p>Along the way I also answered the question &#8220;Do graphics cards with hdmi output sound?&#8221; &#8211; Answer: In 2011, yeah, probably. Going back four or five years this used not to be the case, a card with HDMI may well not have had audio, indeed may not even have provided a connector to grab the audio from the motherboard or soundcard &#8211; but these days this would appear no longer to be the case, if a budget card like the G210 has onboard digital audio output to the HDMI cable, it seems likely that most other graphics cards will do as well. In the world of PC based media centers and gaming on TV&#8217;s this was probably an inevitability. A card supporting HDMI and not supporting audio is just, well, a bit pointless really.</p>
<p>My one remaining problem? The plastic surround on the HDMI cable is too fat preventing the connector from fully inserting into the HDMI socket of the card (it catches on the PC case). I either need to cut the extra plastic off OR buy a flatter one. Grrrrr.</p>
<p>Next I installed a Samsung Bluray drive to replace the existing DVD drive. This came bundled with CyberLink&#8217;s Powerdvd software and supports that products &#8220;TrueTheater&#8221; upscaling technology to upscale SD content on DVD to something approaching HD. You can use this in a split screen before and after mode to look at the changes. I turned off it&#8217;s colour lightening setting whilst setting the sharpening to the middle setting and tested it on some scenes from &#8220;The Lord of the Rings : The Two Towers&#8221; and the improvent is remarkable &#8211; definately no need to buy the Bluray version of the movie. The only slight niggle here, is that whilst the standalone version of Powerdvd works flawlessly, the embedded version that sits within MCE doesn&#8217;t quite display full screen leaving a black border.</p>
<p>So the system currently stands like this:<br />
Gigabyte GA-946GMX-S2 i946GZ Socket 775 onboard VGA 8 channel channel mATX<br />
Intel E2160 Socket 775 Pentium Dual Core 2&#215;1.8Ghz 800FSB Retail Boxed Processor<br />
Asus GeForce G210 SILENT 512MB DDR2 DVI VGA HDMI Out DirectX 10.1 Low Profile PCI-E Graphics Card<br />
4GB Kingston DDR2 RAM</p>
<p>Next time out &#8211; I&#8217;ll be getting surround sound sorted out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/311/hardware/upgrading-media-center-to-hd.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orbitsound &#8211; T4 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/301/video/orbitsound-t4-review.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/301/video/orbitsound-t4-review.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 09:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orbitsound-T4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revo Mondo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPnP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/?p=301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The marketing bumph for this is mostly keen to tell you about the incredible sound technology built in to the T4, how it&#8217;s spacial technology provides a stereo sweet spot wider than an outsize sombrero and all in a package the size of a pint of milk. Well I&#8217;m here to tell you that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The marketing bumph for this is mostly keen to tell you about the incredible sound technology built in to the T4, how it&#8217;s spacial technology provides a stereo sweet spot wider than an outsize sombrero and all in a package the size of a pint of milk.</p>
<p>Well I&#8217;m here to tell you that the sound isn&#8217;t that great. It&#8217;s okay, sure. But it&#8217;s not great. The bass lacks punch and the mid is overbearing. Well what did you expect? As Scotty will say (come the 23rd century) &#8220;you cannae defy the laws of physics&#8221; and I put it to you that for this listener this remains true. It is very hard to get decent bass out of small speakers &#8211; the mid will tend to dominate.</p>
<p>Which begs the question? &#8220;Why do I love the Orbitsound &#8211; T4?&#8221; becaue I have to tell you, I do &#8211; I really do. In fact, I think it&#8217;s a fabulous piece of kit.</p>
<p>The size of a couple of pints of milk &#8211; you get all this:<br />
- DAB and DAB+ radio<br />
- FM Radio<br />
- Internet Radio (inlcuding Podcasts such as from the BBC)<br />
- Support for UPnP Media Playing<br />
- iPod suport<br />
- Aux in<br />
- EQ<br />
all for about 70 english pounds.</p>
<p>But it gets better. For a device this size, the UI is REALLY good. This if for two reasons. First the display can manage 6 lines of about 25 characters so the developers had plenty of space to work with. Second, the UI is quite rich. A display this size, allows a nicely nested menu system. Selecting a podcast from the BBC is not the keyhole surgery of the two line display of the Revo Mondo say (that I&#8217;ve known and loved for the last few years) &#8211; it&#8217;s actually pleasurable. For someone who listens to a lot of talk radio / podcasts (Radio 4 darling!) it&#8217;s a boon.</p>
<p>The switch on / boot time is practically instantaneous and the time to find and connect WiFi to the router if using Internet Radio or UPnP is very quick compared to other devices.</p>
<p>The controls are arranged around the top surface and there&#8217;s no remote control which does make the T4 only really suitable for smaller spaces in the home such as a Kitchen or as a bedside radio. As you return to a function previously used it automatically retunes to the last station selected, or in the case of an iPod, unpauses it (when you move from the iPod to something else, it pauses it again &#8211; nice touch).</p>
<p>In fact given the size and style of the device, you could actually use it as a device to drive an external HiFi in a similar role to something like a Revo Mondo and it wouldn&#8217;t look at all out of place and the sound quality would be well, HiFi. And given that the thing you really want on a remote is a volume control, the lack of a remote then isn&#8217;t a big deal.</p>
<p>My only other gripe is that the floppy wire aerial is a bit position sensitive when listening to DAB &#8211; but that&#8217;s a small detail.</p>
<p>All in all &#8211; I&#8217;m impressed. The developer who coded up the firmware gave a damn and it shows. There are just lots of nice little touches as though the engineers had actually used their own product (heaven forbid!) This is a good piece of kit at a great price. Well done Orbitsound! Can&#8217;t say I understand your marketing though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/301/video/orbitsound-t4-review.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WMP12 and UPnP problems</title>
		<link>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/297/home-networking/wmp12-and-upnp-problems.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/297/home-networking/wmp12-and-upnp-problems.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 22:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revo Mondo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPnP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Media Player 12]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So &#8230; I&#8217;m trying to use Windows Media Player 12 on Windows 7 (32 bit) as a UPnP server. I enable all the things I&#8217;m supposed to enable. My Revo Mondo can &#8220;see&#8221; the server, it can even browse the files. But as soon as it tried to play them &#8230; nada! So I try [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So &#8230; I&#8217;m trying to use Windows Media Player 12 on Windows 7 (32 bit) as a UPnP server. I enable all the things I&#8217;m supposed to enable. My Revo Mondo can &#8220;see&#8221; the server, it can even browse the files. But as soon as it tried to play them &#8230; nada!<br />
So I try with my laptop. Same result. It can&#8217;t play the files.<br />
Just to complete the loop, I try with my Android phone &#8211; again &#8211; it can list the files but not play them.</p>
<p>I try setting permissions on the files &#8220;everyone can read them&#8221; etc&#8230; no change.</p>
<p>In desperation I try using TVersity instead &#8211; but it appears to have the same problem. And additionally seems unable to cope with the size of the mp3 library.</p>
<p>A lot of browsing leads to lots of links on the Microsoft site that seem to have been removed. Only slightly annoying.</p>
<p>Finally &#8211; I work it out.</p>
<p>Like many people &#8211; my media collection has built up over many years. Either on an external drive, or on a secondary internal drive that gets pulled out of the old machine and plonked in the new one every time I upgrade my PC. Of course, when you do this (either with an external drive or with an internal one), the permissions on the files all relate to the old machine. So in effect, the new Windows 7 installation thinks that the drive is actually remote and refuses to serve the media.</p>
<p>If you copy the media (or a small subset of it) to the local drive and make it part of the music library &#8211; you suddenly find you can play it on your UPnP clients. Which is a solution if your system drive has the space. But if it doesn&#8217;t you&#8217;re still stuffed.</p>
<p>Eventually, I found the answer here <a href="http://forums.techarena.in/media-player/1168138.htm">http://forums.techarena.in/media-player/1168138.htm</a>. God bless &#8220;Vincent&#8221;, whoever you are.</p>
<p>The solution is as follows:<br />
1. Click Start, click Run, type regedit, and then click OK.<br />
2. In the registry tree (on the left), expand HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, SOFTWARE,<br />
Microsoft, MediaPlayer, and then Preferences.<br />
3. Right-click HME, point to New, and then click DWORD Value.<br />
4. Type EnableRemoteContentSharing, and then press ENTER.<br />
5. Right-click EnableRemoteContentSharing, and then click Modify.<br />
6. In the Value data text box, type 1, and then click OK. If you later<br />
decide to disable remote content sharing, you can repeat this procedure and<br />
change the value to 0.</p>
<p>To repeat, even though this text is talking about RemoteContentSharing and technically your content is not remote (it&#8217;s either on an external drive attached to the machine, or an internal secondary drive) &#8211; Windows thinks it is because of the obsolete permissions on the files. Following the steps above, will make your world a better place, full of whatever sounds fill your mp3 collection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/297/home-networking/wmp12-and-upnp-problems.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting a SiliconImage Sil3114 SATA RAID card to work in Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/279/hardware/getting-a-siliconimage-sil3114-sata-raid-card-to-work-in-windows-7.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/279/hardware/getting-a-siliconimage-sil3114-sata-raid-card-to-work-in-windows-7.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 21:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SATA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/?p=279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently had the experience of moving a pair of RAID1 storage disks from one server to another. It was not without difficulty. Both server&#8217;s had the OS on a third non RAIDed drive, so i didn&#8217;t have to worry about being able to boot from them (thank god!) The server they came from, an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently had the experience of moving a pair of RAID1 storage disks from one server to another. It was not without difficulty.<br />
Both server&#8217;s had the OS on a third non RAIDed drive, so i didn&#8217;t have to worry about being able to boot from them (thank god!)</p>
<p>The server they came from, an old MSI AMD motherboard had a Promise RAID controller built in. The Gigabyte board I was moving to did not, so I had to add an additional RAID controller on a PCI card.<br />
The board chosen used a chipset from SilconImage &#8211; the Sil3114. This is an inexpensive card offering RAID0,1,5,10 &amp; JBOD.</p>
<p>The card as delivered plugged into an empty PCI slot easy enough. However the motherboard recognised this only some of the time. (This was subsequently either resolved by a BIOS update to the card &#8211; more on this later &#8211; or pushing down hard on the card to ensure it was fully in &#8211; not sure which).</p>
<p>The Sil3114 card can be used in one of two configurations. As a RAID controller for up to 4 SATA drives. This requires a SATA RAID bios to be installed on the card (the default) and some SATARAID5 manager software to be installed in Windows.<br />
OR &#8211; it can be used as a straight disk controller for up to 4 SATA drives (no RAID) &#8211; this is called &#8220;SATA Link&#8221; and requires SATA Link software in Windows. You can also install a SATA Link &#8220;base&#8221; BIOS to the card as well, instead of the RAID one, but since the SATARAID BIOS has a pass thru mode which allows the use of drives in a non RAID configuration, it makes you wonder why you&#8217;d bother.</p>
<p>The job then was to plug the drives in, set them up as a RAID group without losing the data already on them and then get them visible and useable in Windows.</p>
<p>After plugging the drives in, I went into the Silicon Image SATA RAID BIOS utility. Here I was able to create a RAID1 group containing the two drives. I allowed it to re-mirror the data from one drive to the other as part of this. The mirroring process took several hours for my Samsung Spinpoint 500GB drives.</p>
<p>After booting into Windows, Windows 7 automatically downloaded a bunch of driver software which it seemed to think would work. It also added an item to the Windows Control Panel called &#8220;Silicon Logic SATA RAID&#8221;. Despite clicking on this item many times &#8211; it never did anything.<br />
In addition to this you need to install the SATARAID5 manager software which allows you to configure the disks in windows. This can be downloaded from the SiliconImage website here:<br />
<a href="http://www.siliconimage.com/support/searchresults.aspx?pid=28&amp;cat=3">http://www.siliconimage.com/support/searchresults.aspx?pid=28&amp;cat=3</a><br />
Make sure you have at least version 1.5.20.3 of this.</p>
<p>These downloads inexplicably include an old copy of the Java virtual machine runtime environment. Ironically this doesn&#8217;t actually work with the SATARAID5 manager software it comes with. Genius! Although it will allow you to view the status of your disks &#8211; it won&#8217;t allow you to actually do anything with them, all the menu items just do nothing (I subsequently managed to run the manager in a console mode and found that all the menu items were throwing exceptions &#8211; ie: broken).<br />
However if you install the latest version of the Java runtime from Sun (available <a href="http://www.java.com/en/download/manual.jsp">here</a>) &#8211; the manager software does work properly.</p>
<p>So now I was able to examine my disks using the SATARAID5 manager. They were marked as a Legacy RAID Group and painted red. In the Windows &#8220;Disk Management&#8221; window (right click on &#8220;Computer&#8221; in Windows Explorer, select &#8220;Manage&#8221; and then clicking &#8220;Disk Storage&#8221;) they were not visible at all.</p>
<p>So &#8211; problem! My disks are there, presumably with data and I can&#8217;t read them. And what the hell is a legacy RAID group?</p>
<p>After much reading of the siliconimage website, I downloaded updated versions of the Sil3114 BIOS<br />
Specifically BIOS version: 5.4.0.3 available from <a href="http://www.siliconimage.com/support/searchresults.aspx?pid=28&amp;cat=15&amp;ctid=2&amp;os=0&amp;">here</a>.<br />
The combination of BIOS 5.4.0.3 and SATARAID5 Manager 1.5.20.3 was the one I settled on that finally worked.</p>
<p>The BIOS can be updated by opening Windows &#8220;Device Manager&#8221;, finding the Sil3114 under &#8220;Storage Controlers&#8221;, right clicking and selecting &#8220;Properties&#8221;. One of the tabs has a button for updating the BIOS here &#8211; it&#8217;s straightforward.</p>
<p>One option offered by the SATARAID5 manager software was to &#8220;Convert the Legacy RAID group&#8221; to a &#8220;New RAID group&#8221; &#8211; I wasn&#8217;t quite sure what this would do but as far as I could tell a Legacy group can be read natively by the card, whereas the New group uses the manager software / drivers instead.<br />
Hardware vs Software RAID then? Not sure. But I&#8217;m pretty certain that a New RAID group would be much tougher to setup as a boot drive. So legacy would seem better &#8211; if only it could be made to be seen in the Windows &#8220;Disk Management&#8221; window.</p>
<p>So &#8211; I took one of the two drives out and let the system boot. Still couldn&#8217;t see it.<br />
Deleted the RAID group in the BIOS and let the system boot. Now we could see the drive. SATARAID5 recognised it as a normal non-RAID disk, went into PASSTHRU mode and allowed it&#8217;s use. (It is this PASSTHRU mode that makes the alternative SATA Link BIOS software pretty pointless in my view as it acheives the same result),<br />
NB: Whilst deleting a RAID group only seems to delete the RAID metadata from the hard drives with the Sil3114, leaving the data intact, the same might not be the case with other RAID controllers. Beware!<br />
I now reinstalled the other disk, delete the RAID group from that as well and let the system boot.<br />
The system could now see both drives in PASSTHRU mode, the partitions were intact, but the &#8220;Disk Management&#8221; window informed me that it couldn&#8217;t mount the second drive as it had the same identifier as the first. Which of course it would &#8211; so that seemed reasonable.</p>
<p>SO &#8211; rebooted again &#8211; went back into the RAID BIOS and recreated the RAID group, I didn&#8217;t bother to make it copy the data again as it was clearly going to be the same, and then let the system boot.</p>
<p>This time success. The drives were still recognised as a Legacy RAID group, but this time were painted green in the SATARAID5 manager software and were visible and useable in Windows 7. A check in &#8220;Disk Management&#8221; showed that a single drive was being recognised (ie: the two disks are successfully operating as a RAID1 mirror pair).</p>
<p>I have no idea why they were painted red the first time and green the second, other than that maybe the RAID BIOS was very old when I created the first pair and the metadata was a bit rubbish.</p>
<p>Anyway &#8211; all well in the end.</p>
<p>So yes &#8211; it is possible to get the Sil3114 to drive a pair of RAID1 disks in Windows 7. (Phew!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/279/hardware/getting-a-siliconimage-sil3114-sata-raid-card-to-work-in-windows-7.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Batch Convert WTV files to DVRMS and MPEG</title>
		<link>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/263/video/batch-convert-wtv-files-to-dvrms-and-mpeg.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/263/video/batch-convert-wtv-files-to-dvrms-and-mpeg.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVRMSToolbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Microsoft released Windows 7 / the TV Service Pack for VISTA, they changed the file format from dvr-ms, as used in MCE 2005 to a new wtv format. What does this new wtv format do for us that dvr-ms did not? Well that&#8217;s probably a subject for wikipedia, but for those of us watching [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Microsoft released Windows 7 / the TV Service Pack for VISTA, they changed the file format from dvr-ms, as used in MCE 2005 to a new wtv format.</p>
<p>What does this new wtv format do for us that dvr-ms did not? Well that&#8217;s probably a subject for wikipedia, but for those of us watching Freeview in the UK &#8211; not a lot.</p>
<p>However what it does do, is stop us using other nice utilities such as DVRMSToolbox plus wtv files are half as big again as the dvr-ms files they replace. So a 3GB wtv file is equivalent to a 2GB dvr-ms file. Or to put it another way, that 1TB drive you bought so you could keep lots of shows, is now only worth 666GB. Which sucks.</p>
<p>So I want to convert my wtv files to dvr-ms files.</p>
<p>A very easy solution is simply to right click on the wtv file and select the option &#8220;Convert to .dvr-ms&#8221; format. However this has to be done one right click at a time (there&#8217;s no multi select) and rapidly becomes very tedious.</p>
<p>DVRMSToolbox with a bit of profile tweaking and using it&#8217;s FileWatcher feature can be made to do it automatically for you &#8211; but it is a bit fiddly to setup, and you have to have FileWatcher running continually.</p>
<p>However you can automate the whole process using DOS batch files. And if you want it to run periodically, use the Windows Scheduler service to kick it off, say, daily in the middle of the night.</p>
<p>So what would such a batch file look like? Well &#8211; this did take a couple of hours and a bit of research as my DOS batch scripting skills aren&#8217;t all that great &#8211; hence why I share it here.</p>
<address>ConvertAll.bat</address>
<pre>@echo off

echo "Create wtv file list..."
dir /b *.wtv &gt; d:\wtvlist.txt

echo "Process wtv file list..."
for /f "usebackq delims=" %%a IN (d:\wtvlist.txt) do call wtvrunner.bat "%%a"

echo "Cleaning Up"
del d:\wtvlist.txt</pre>
<p>Drop the batch file into the directory you want to convert.</p>
<p>It works by creating a temporary file list in a txt file and looping through each entry in that file and passing it to a second batch file called &#8220;wtvrunner.bat&#8221;.</p>
<p>The wtvrunner.bat file then calls the standard windows utility for converting from wtv to dvr-ms (the same one used by the right click method above), converts the file and (if the output file was successfully created) deletes the wtv original. It&#8217;s a good idea to delete the wtv files as you go along rather than with a single del *.wtv at the end as it greatly limits the amount of free disk space required to convert a batch of files.</p>
<address>wtvrunner.bat</address>
<pre>SET infile=%~1
SET outfile=%infile:~0,-4%
SET "outfile=%outfile% - DVRMS.dvr-ms"
echo %outfile%
c:\windows\ehome\WTVconverter.exe "%infile%"
IF EXIST "%outfile%" del "%infile%"
</pre>
<p>(NB: wtvconverter.exe is not available on Windows XP. Copying it onto an XP box doesn&#8217;t work either as it relies on other Windows 7 assemblies. So this is really Windows 7 only).</p>
<p>That works well then. Double Click the ConvertAll.bat file and a whole directory of wtv files gets converted to dvr-ms files.</p>
<p>However for other reasons, my workflow required me to then convert all the dvr-ms files to mpg files. So now I needed to add to the scripts to use DVRMSToolbox to do the conversion from dvrms to mpg.</p>
<p>So now ConvertAll.bat looks like this:</p>
<address>ConvertAll.bat</address>
<pre>@echo off

echo "Create wtv file list..."
dir /b *.wtv &gt; d:\wtvlist.txt

echo "Process wtv file list..."
for /f "usebackq delims=" %%a IN (d:\wtvlist.txt) do call wtvrunner.bat "%%a"

echo "Create dvr-ms file list..."
dir /b *.dvr-ms &gt; d:\dvrmslist.txt

echo "Process dvr-ms file list..."
for /f "usebackq delims=" %%a IN (d:\dvrmslist.txt) do call dvrmsrunner.bat "%%a"

echo "Cleaning Up"
del d:\wtvlist.txt
del d:\dvrmslist.txt</pre>
<p>This introduces a third batch file called &#8220;dvrmsrunner.bat&#8221; which handles the conversion of the dvr-ms files to mpg&#8217;s using DVRMSToolbox. This looks like this:</p>
<address>dvrmsrunner.bat</address>
<pre>SET infile=%~1
SET outfile=%infile:.dvr-ms=.mpg%
"C:\Program Files (x86)\DVRMSToolbox\DVRMStoMPEG.exe" /if="%infile%" /of="%outfile%" /p=16384 /act="ffmpeg"
IF EXIST "%outfile%" del "%infile%"</pre>
<p>Again this deletes the input files (if the output was successfully created) as soon as the conversion is finished to save space.</p>
<p>Job done.</p>
<p><strong>NB: Scripts updated to only delete input files on success.</strong></p>
<p>References:</p>
<blockquote><p>Jim 2.5&#8242;s Blog &#8211; <a title="Artivle on DOS loops" href="http://jamesewelch.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/how-to-write-a-dos-batch-file-to-loop-through-files/" target="_blank">Article on DOS loops</a><br />
John John&#8217;s post from <a title="this thread" href="http://forums.techarena.in/windows-xp-support/1187678.htm" target="_self">this thread</a> on looping through lists of filenames that have spaces in.<br />
<a title="This article on dos string manipulation" href="http://www.dostips.com/DtTipsStringManipulation.php#Snippets.Replace" target="_blank">This article on dos string manipulation</a> for replacing .dvr-ms extension with .mpg<br />
macdad&#8217;s post from <a href="http://www.computerhope.com/forum/index.php?topic=78901.0"> this thread</a> on stripping off three character file extensions from file names.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/263/video/batch-convert-wtv-files-to-dvrms-and-mpeg.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PC Freezes Randomly</title>
		<link>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/239/hardware/pc-freezes-randomly.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/239/hardware/pc-freezes-randomly.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/?p=239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An overlooked classic this one. Your PC crashes randomly. It just locks up. You can still see the screen but the mouse no move. The computer no worky. Very commonly ,this is not caused by component failure as such but by a build up of dust and crud in the machine. A clue to this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An overlooked classic this one. Your PC crashes randomly. It just locks up. You can still see the screen but the mouse no move. The computer no worky.</p>
<p>Very commonly ,this is <b>not</b> caused by component failure as such but by a build up of dust and crud in the machine. A clue to this in systems that support varying fan speeds, would be the system fan running almost continuously in high speed mode.</p>
<p>There are a number of things you can do to help here:<br />
- The first is to go into the BIOS and raise the temperature at which the motherboard shuts down the CPU. A low setting can lead to the BIOS being over cautios and shutting down the CPU at to low a temperature.<br />
- The second, and most important, thing to do &#8211; is to get a can of compressed air and blast it through the fins of the CPU heatsink. Dust on the heatsink drastically reduces the airflow available and in doing so, horribly reduces the effectiveness of the heatsink. If great clouds of dust fly out the other side of the heatsink &#8211; you&#8217;ve probably done yourself a favor. If you don&#8217;t have any canned air to hand you can always try lung power &#8211; but it isn&#8217;t as effective and tends to lead to coughing fits after inhalnig the disturbed dust. Which isn&#8217;t great!<br />
- Third as a long term preventative, if possible re-site the computer. In our house ther computer which suffers most from this, is the Media Center. This lives close to the ground (under the TV) about an inch or so above the carpet. A very dust prone environment. Moving it higher or enclosing it in some sort of glass fronted TV cabinaet, would relieve the problem greatly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/239/hardware/pc-freezes-randomly.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not all TV Cards are Created Equal</title>
		<link>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/229/video/not-all-tv-cards-are-created-equal.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/229/video/not-all-tv-cards-are-created-equal.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PVR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/?p=229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question So, what is the difference between one TV card and another; given you can buy dual tuner cards that will allow you to record two channels of DVB-T for next to nothing &#8211; what do the more expensive cards give you? This has been bothering me since my last post on my Windows 7 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Question</h3>
<p>So, what is the difference between one TV card and another; given you can buy dual tuner cards that will allow you to record two channels of DVB-T for next to nothing &#8211; what do the more expensive cards give you?</p>
<p>This has been bothering me since my last post on my Windows 7 MCE. Indeed its been bothering me ever since I did my original tests with Windows 7 RC1. That build seemed rather better in terms of responsiveness than the actual Windows 7 one did. There are of course lots of differences between the systems. One was RC Ultimate edition, the other the released Home premium, different disk drives as well &#8211; but one thing I had overlooked was the TV Tuner Card. Due to a problem with the Black Gold Signature cards (you can&#8217;t use two together under Windows 7 as you could in XP), when I built the final system I replaced the single Black Gold card I had used in the RC with a new Dual Tuner card from Peak.</p>
<p>In terms of the recorded programs, the Peak card has produced excellent results &#8211; but in this very underpowered, single core setup it has struggled to encode data when the machine was doing other things such as fast forwarding a different program being watched simultaneously.</p>
<p>Putting the single Black Gold tuner back in to the system, revolutionised it. It&#8217;s as quick as Windows MCE 2005 ever was.</p>
<h3>Answer</h3>
<p>And that&#8217;s the difference, the more expensive cards do much more of the encoding effort, relieving the burden from the CPU. Freeing it up to be responsive to user requests (such as &#8220;Fast Forward my program please&#8221; or &#8220;can I see the Guide whilst my program still plays please&#8221;) without crashing.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>Which brings you to a simple choice:<br />
It&#8217;s relatively easy to build a great PVR around an old motherboard, CPU and Windows 7, if you add high end TV tuners (encoders) and an average Graphics card (decoder) because all the heavy duty processing isn&#8217;t being done by the old hardware. It&#8217;s beeing done by dedicated high end video encoders in the TV tuner, or in the dedicated MPEG2 decoding pipeline of the Graphics card. Which rather bursts the balloon on the sense of acheivement to be honest. But for a machine which lives under the TV which is only used as a telly, does make a lot of sense.</p>
<p>But if you want a more versatile all round machine for which watching TV is only one of it&#8217;s role, then you just have to get something with a lot more CPU muscle, preferably with multiple cores so that it&#8217;s responsive. You then don&#8217;t need high end encoders and cheaper cards such as the Peak, will more thasn do the job. Stability might still be an issue though &#8211; as an asside, I notice that the machine is much less prone to crashing now. Fast Forward (when recording something else), was a bit risky previously. Makes sense really. Dedicated hardware encoders and decoders always do just that &#8211; encode/decode video. A CPU by contrast can be nagged by any one of a zillion different systems to interrupt what it&#8217;s doing and just quickly do something else. Which is all fine until it hits something that is time, or timing critical. Bang.</p>
<p>It still hasn&#8217;t cost that much. A new Black Gold Dual Tuner card is £80 which even when added to the cost of the new graphics &#8211; is under £100. Which is cheaper than buying a new motherboard, RAM, CPU &#8211; and you&#8217;d still have to buy the graphics card anyway. But it&#8217;s not the saving you&#8217;d hope for &#8211; particularly when you consider that you can buy good dedicated dual tuner PVR&#8217;s for less than double the price of the Black Gold card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/229/video/not-all-tv-cards-are-created-equal.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Squeezing more Performance out of Windows 7 Media Center</title>
		<link>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/214/video/squeezing-more-performance-out-of-windows-7-media-center.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/214/video/squeezing-more-performance-out-of-windows-7-media-center.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/?p=214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So then, the wife isn&#8217;t that happy with Windows 7 Media Center. It deosn&#8217;t always respond to her remote control commands (usually when its recording something else) which is annoying. So here at Gibbon Towers, it was time to do some work to see what was going on in terms of system resources. Hmmm &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So then, the wife isn&#8217;t that happy with Windows 7 Media Center. It deosn&#8217;t always respond to her remote control commands (usually when its recording something else) which is annoying.</p>
<p>So here at Gibbon Towers, it was time to do some work to see what was going on in terms of system resources. Hmmm &#8211; first thing was that there wan&#8217;t much free RAM left on the machine. Never a good sign. So time to turn off whatever I could to free up some RAM and some CPU clock cycles.</p>
<h3>Switching off Features</h3>
<p>Started off by switching off a bunch of Windows Features. In Windows 7 there&#8217;s a proper app to do this, not just an uninstaller. Just type &#8220;Windows Features&#8221; into the start menu. Rather cleverly, it properly unloads and disables them so that they use no system resources whatsoever rather than uninstall them altogether. Which means that when you want to re-enable them at so,me later date &#8211; you haven&#8217;t got the arse of trying to find the DVD. Result!</p>
<h3>Switching off Services</h3>
<p>I then set about switching off all the Windows 7 Services not required for watching or using the Media Center application (NB: we don&#8217;t use Media Extenders either) in Windows 7 Home Premium Edition. Thus I disabled the following services:</p>
<ul>
<li> Background Intelligent Transfer Service</li>
<li> Desktop Window Manager Session Manager</li>
<li> Distributed Link Tracking Client</li>
<li> HomeGroup Listener</li>
<li> HomeGroup Provider</li>
<li> IP Helper</li>
<li> Peer Name Resolution Protocol</li>
<li> Peer Networking Grouping</li>
<li> Peer Networking Identity Manager</li>
<li> PNRP Machine Name Publication Service</li>
<li> Print Spooler</li>
<li> Themes</li>
<li> Windows Media Player Network Sharing Service</li>
</ul>
<p>For more information on what services do what, in Windows 7 (and how safe it is to disable them) &#8211; the <a href="http://www.blackviper.com/Windows_7/service411.htm">Black Viper website</a> is superb.</p>
<p>Given that we&#8217;re not going to have Extenders in other rooms, not going to use the new HomeGroup functionality (you still have networking without HomeGroup), I switched off Aero and all the Theme stuff (Media Center doesn&#8217;t use them) &#8211; and I&#8217;m not going to do any printing. All of which makes sense because the machine really does just live under the telly, playing video, in our house.</p>
<p>Doing all of this had an immediate and dramatic impact on responsiveness. In fact the remote control is back to MCE 2005 levels of useability which is excellent. And looking at the system resources there&#8217;s much more free RAM in the system (it released hundreds of MB).</p>
<h3>Other Changes</h3>
<p>I then did a comparison of CPU&#8217;usage of NVidia&#8217;s PureVideo decoder against Microsoft&#8217;s decoder by having them in turn play back the same video file. According to task manager, PureVideo was about 10% more intensive on the CPU;. Since I can see no difference in quality &#8211; I&#8217;ll go with Microsoft then.</p>
<p>XVID had become a car crash again. Turned out that Windows had managed to undo the hack I applied form the previous host to get it working. Reapplying the hack not only fixed XVID but also improved responsiveness, particularly when recording another program at the same time.</p>
<p>I also upgraded the CPU from an Athlon XP 1600+ to a 2100+, because err&#8230; I could. And it only cost £5. And it made absolutely no difference whatsoever.</p>
<h3>Setting up Power Saving Modes</h3>
<p>Finally the guy at Slick Solutions has produced a new version of his MCE Standby Tool for Windows 7 &#8211; which I can&#8217;t recommend enough. Get that from a link somewhere in this post <a href="http://www.degroeneknop.nl/forum/index.php/topic,4989.75.html">http://www.degroeneknop.nl/forum/index.php/topic,4989.75.htmlhttp://www.degroeneknop.nl/forum/index.php/topic,4989.75.html</a> Really sorts out the power management. If you think it&#8217;s good, make a donatation to him.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>So after spending a few quid (most notably on both a TV card and a Graphics card) &#8211; the whole system does now work. It works well when playing back, or recording one or two channels together. It still struggles when doing all three together particularly when using the remote to fast forward or rewind).</p>
<p>For reference the two biggest improvements were turning off the unwanted bits of Windows, and applying the codec patch from the GreenButton website.</p>
<p>When I find some time I want to do a comparison of CPU usage on the Black Gold card vs the PEAK one. I have a feeling that the Black Gold one takes on more of the work of encoding whilst the PEAK one leaves more to the CPU. But that&#8217;s just a guess at the moment.</p>
<h3>A Random Gotcha</h3>
<p>NB: One other problem that fooled me a bit was that the disk became full. Until I freed up some space that murdered performance as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/214/video/squeezing-more-performance-out-of-windows-7-media-center.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 MCE &#8211; The Ongoing Saga</title>
		<link>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/208/video/windows-7-mce-the-ongoing-saga.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/208/video/windows-7-mce-the-ongoing-saga.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xvid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well as mentioned in the earlier post, as soon as Windows 7 was released, I rushed out and bought a copy and installed it on the Media Centre. There have been quite a few problems. Some known &#8211; some unknown. TV Cards I already knew I was going to have to replace the TV cards [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well as mentioned in the earlier post, as soon as Windows 7 was released, I rushed out and bought a copy and installed it on the Media Centre.</p>
<p>There have been quite a few problems. Some known &#8211; some unknown.</p>
<h3>TV Cards</h3>
<p>I already knew I was going to have to replace the TV cards as the Black Gold ones couldn&#8217;t be used as a pair under either Vista or Windows 7 due to a design flaw either in the cards or the revised driver model used from Vista onwards. So I bought a new PCI Dual Tuner DVB-T card from Peak (that takes just the one slot). And that resolved that. The new card is much slower to tune than the Black Gold, but once configured, is much more responsive to changing channel during viewing. Its been very reliable ever since and the quality of recording is identical (ie: excellent).</p>
<h3>Graphics Card</h3>
<p>The next problem was the Graphics card. Again as previously mentioned, the drivers for the GeForce 5200 FX from Nvidia are a bare minimum. Many of the controls that were available under Windows XP were not present under Windows 7 (&amp; Vista). Worse, even though I set 720&#215;576, the display was still a bit smaller than the TV display with some strange curved geometry, and there was no way of growing the display size as there had been under XP. Some of the graphics and video playback was also a bit jittery. I was pretty sure that any graphics acceleration capability on the card was also inaccessible and usused. A search on the NVidia website showed that they&#8217;d just released Windows &amp; drivers for all cards from the GeForce 6 series and up. Reading between the lines then, there&#8217;s no chance of anything for the 5200. It really is outrageous that in 2009 this card is still sold new and yet you can&#8217;t get full drivers for either Vista or Windows 7 &#8211; just crippled ones. Thus, the only solution was to upgrade &#8211; which as the motherboard has an AGP slot was going to be a challenge. However &#8211; I mamanaged to find a new GeForce 6200 with an AGP interface and 256MB of RAM for about 30 quid, so bought that. This resolves the problem, particularly once MCE starts and expands the screen slightly (resolving the Geometry problem).</p>
<p>Two other problems I hit in the Graphics card area.</p>
<p>First the NVidia PureVideo totally crashed the machine with the original GeForce FX 5200 (weird as it worked with Win 7 RC1). So I had to go with the Microsoft ones which seem to work a bit better than in Win7 RC1. Retesting the PureVideo with the new 6200 card &#8211; the good news was that it no longer crashes. The bad news is that (subjectively), it&#8217;s no better or more responsive than the Microsoft ones. On that basis I went with Microsoft.</p>
<p>The second, was an accidental Black Screen in MCE. I caused this by twiddling with the AGP aperture size. I reduced it to 16MB thinking that with 256MB onboard it wouldn&#8217;t need much extra RAM from the system. Wrong! MCE became a black screen. I could hear the sounds of it loading along with occasional swishes of colour but then, just an unhappy black screen. Setting the Aperture Size back to 256MB resolved the problem.</p>
<h3>Networking</h3>
<p>Elsewhere, I ran into problems with the Realtek network card which was causing a boot lockup (if the network cable was plugged in). The card doesn&#8217;t seat quite perfectly in the PCI slot (the bracket is slightly too long at the bottom). Forcing the network speed down to 100Mbps rather than allowing it to negotiate 1Gbps seems to resolve it. But I can&#8217;t help feeling that filing down the bracket would solve the problem properly. That or a more expensive card. And it&#8217;s annoying because you really want 1Gbps bandwidth in a Mediacenter if you&#8217;re going to use the video data elsewhere.</p>
<h3>XVID</h3>
<p>The slow XVID playback problem was resolved using help from The Green Button website in <a href="http://thegreenbutton.com/forums/t/78749.aspx">this article</a>. Whoever worked that out &#8211; is a genius!!</p>
<p>This inadvertantly solved much of another problem I was having with responsiveness. No idea why. Whenever I was watching a program and went to view the guide (say) using the remote, the guide would display and then the system would lock up. The program would continue to play in the background &#8211; but the system would become totally unresponsive for minutes at a time. The DivX hack in the article helped this problem hugely (though it&#8217;s still a bit slow).</p>
<p>And hey presto &#8211; one working Windows 7 mediacenter, running on kit that&#8217;s mostly about 7 years old.</p>
<p>As I said before, it isn&#8217;t ever going to work well with HD content &#8211; but it works just fine for standard TV content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wonkygibbon.co.uk/208/video/windows-7-mce-the-ongoing-saga.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

